How Orme OS turns what you sell into buying signals you can check
An ICP tells you who could buy. Public evidence tells you who needs it now. How Orme works out which signals to watch from your own offering, where it looks, and why every signal needs a quote and a link.
On this page7
Short answer
Orme OS starts from what you sell, not from firmographics. It works out which events make a company need your product now, watches free public sources for them, and counts a signal only when it can quote the page and link to it. Accounts are ranked by that evidence, with the reasons written out for the seller.
Why isn't an ICP enough to find buyers?
#An ideal customer profile describes who could buy: industry, headcount, region, the tools they run. It says nothing about timing. Two companies can match on every one of those fields while one of them hired a new VP of Sales last month and posted three sales development roles, and the other froze hiring in June.
Only one of them has a reason to talk to you this quarter, and the difference is sitting in public, on their careers page and in the news. Most outbound treats the two the same, because the list was built from the profile and nothing else.
How does Orme work out which signals to watch?
#From a description of what you sell: the offering, the customer profile, the proof points and the people you sell to. The signal engine drafts a wide list of events that could indicate a need, ties each one to a source where it can be observed, and cuts the ones that cost too much to watch for what they reveal. Every signal that survives carries a sentence explaining why it predicts buying, where it is watched and how quickly it goes stale.
For a company selling sales tooling, a few signals might read like this:
- A job post for a revenue operations manager that names Salesforce. They are investing in the process around the CRM, and whoever they hire will want tools on day one.
- A new VP of Sales in the last 90 days. New sales leaders often revisit the stack early, while they still have the mandate to change it.
- A pricing page that moved from "contact us" to published tiers. The motion is shifting toward volume, and the sales process has to change with it.
Where does Orme look for buying signals?
#In free public sources first: the company's own website and careers page, public job boards, news, SEC filings, trade press, certificate transparency logs (which show new subdomains being set up), archived copies of pages (which show what changed and when), and court records.
Paid data is worth buying for an account only after a free signal has fired on it, so the expensive checks are reserved for accounts that have already given a reason.
How does Orme stop AI from inventing signals?
#A signal either fired, with a verbatim quote and a link anyone can open, or it did not fire. There is no third answer. The quote is checked against the page before it is kept, and the database refuses an observation that claims to have fired without one. When a check finds nothing, the account page says so: checked, nothing found.
The quote does a second job. It is what the seller can refer to in the first email, and it takes five seconds to verify before sending.
How are accounts ranked?
#Recent evidence counts for more than old evidence, so a job post from last week outweighs one from last spring. The score is explainable line by line: each account shows which signals fired, with the quote and link for each, so a seller can see why it is on the list and disagree if something looks wrong.
In Orme OS a ranked account becomes a signal card with the evidence, the source, when it was found and the reasons in plain words. From the card, a seller can start a play, dismiss it with a reason, or mute it.
How does the signal list get better over time?
#When an account turns into a meeting or a deal, or goes nowhere, the outcome is recorded against the signals that were present at the time. That shows the lift each signal delivers, and Orme suggests new weights for a person to review. The list improves because it is checked against what happened.